They may not be the best GPS receivers on the planet, but they speak directly to the camera so you don't have to do the geotagging in post.ģ. Nikon and Canon both make GPS devices (Nikon GP-1, Canon GP-E2) that can be connected to some of their camera bodies, and relay the GPS information so that geotags can be added to the EXIF as you shoot. This is by far the most convenient path to take, with the main caveats of reduced battery life and a more expensive camera. For example, swapping from a 5D to a 6D would gain you this capability, and you'd just have to switch it on in the camera. Some cameras have geotagging and GPS capability built-in. I'm listing them from least to most effort (and possibly most to least cost, assuming you have a smartphone). When it comes to geotagging your images with a system camera, there are several options, some rely on the camera feature set, and some don't. Sony instead took the easiest, laziest, cheapest way out by removing the option.I'm actually going to answer the question with a wider focus than just the 5D or dSLRs, but for interchangeable-lens system cameras in general, to try and get a more useful answer. If there were technical reasons involved, what would a forward-thinking company do? Work on them and progressively improve the technology for the benefit of everyone. (BTW, don't people have smartphones in China?) If so, Sony is a wimpy company regarding human rights. Others say it was to avoid having to make 'V' and 'non-V' versions of cameras in order to more easily accommodate markets under repressive governments such as China, where GPS tracking is unwelcome. Some people hypothesize that built-in GPS wasn't fast or accurate enough or required too much battery power (which can be disproven). It can't have been due to cost or insufficient room in camera bodies because the very best implementation of Sony GPS I've ever seen is in the small and lowly HX5V and HX9V P&S cameras, which include a compass so you get not only location data, but also the direction in which the camera was pointed! True to form, Sony never publicly explained anything about their quiet removal of GPS so people can only speculate. Were there technical reasons for this, or licensing issues, or was it purely a marketing decision? I agree it does seem strange to remove a newish technological feature which provides significant capability from a range of cameras which otherwise seek to embrace the best of new technology. The whole process of transferring data from the device to the computer and geotagging the photos it's basically done in minutes for several hundreds images. It may sound a little complicated, but once you do it for the first time you will realize hot easy it really is. This is my regular workflow when I use one of my cameras without GPS (since just like you I consider geotagging an extremely useful feature). The other just transfers the recorded data in a standard file (I use. One can geotag your photos based on the info stored by the device, but I found it too complicated and cumbersome to use. The tracker is delivered with two programs. I can confirm that I had no issue using it during a 10-12 days holiday, although I cannot remember how much of its memory was filled when I got back home. ![]() Battery life is somewhere between 12 to 14 hours and it can record 40 days x 12 hours 5s. I personally use a small dedicated GPS tracker manufactured by Qstarz. ![]() Based on my experience, whatever the developers claim, all these phone apps have a serious impact on the phone's battery which makes them not so practical to use. I use a small & free piece of software working in Windows, which is called GeoSetter. You can then transfer these files to your computer and use them for geotagging. ![]() There are quite a few apps both for iOS and Android that can record your position in a standard format (.kml.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |